- Home
- Publications
- PAGES Magazine
- Past Land Use and Soil Erosion Processes In Central Europe
Past land use and soil erosion processes in central Europe
Markus Dotterweich and Stefan Dreibrodt
PAGES news
19(2)
49-51
2011
Markus Dotterweich1 and Stefan Dreibrodt2
1Institute of Geography, University of Mainz, Germany; mail@markus-dotterweich.de
2Institute for Ecosystem Research, University of Kiel, Germany
7500 years of land use and soil erosion data provide an insight into modern links between human activities and the environment.
Agricultural development and geomorphology
The development of natural and socio-ecologically adapted agroecosystems, which have the capacity to ease demand on food and resources and mitigate climate change, is a major challenge. Looking at past land-use systems and their socio-economic history increases our understanding of slow processes and low-frequency events. These underlying processes appear to be key in assessing whether modern land-use systems will lead to sustainability or collapse.
In central Europe, phases of agricultural expansion and regression occurred with land clearance and reforestation back to the onset of agriculture, around 7500 years ago. Under natural conditions (except for short phases of severe climate deterioration in the early Holocene), the sheltering cover of vegetation and soil development largely mitigated geomorphic processes, resulting in a stable dynamic equilibrium (Dotterweich, 2008). With the clearing of forests, the natural water and matter fluxes changed into anthropogenically driven systems with greatly accelerated processes and higher vulnerability to soil erosion. Repeated or extreme events forced by climate change may have affected the fertility of the land to an extent that it could no longer be cultivated. On a local- to regional scale, this may occur surprisingly rapidly, especially in strong single events. As the system develops, two outcomes may occur: a) Driving forces may progress slowly, causing gradual and predictable degradation, or b) Exceptional events may trigger catastrophic changes, forcing premature abandonment of agricultural land. Regardless of the rate of degradation, the system will evolve through a reorganization phase and ultimately reach a new equilibrium, where either naturally or anthropogenically driven processes dominate the overall system.
Figure 1: Dynamics of soil erosion in small catchments (A) and river activity (B, C, D, E) in central Europe since the beginning of agriculture, based on studies by different authors. Blue numbers correlate to site names, type of geoarchive and references given in supplementary material (www.pages-igbp.org/products/newsletters/ref2011_2.pdf). Yellow shading represents cultural epochs (Figure modified from Dotterweich, 2008). |
As a result of these processes, erosion has changed soil conditions and patterns in many areas of Central Europe. Material has been washed downslope and gullies have incised, leading to the deposition of sediments at the slopes (colluvial layers), in floodplains (alluvial layers) or lakes (allochthonous input). These erosional landforms and depositional structures are geoarchives of past land use, human impact and climate change, at broad temporal (daily to millennia) and spatial (gully/slope to floodplains) scales. Efforts to retrieve these data have increased during the last few years (Fig. 1 and 2; Dotterweich, 2008; Dreibrodt et al., 2010; Notebaert and Verstraeten, 2010; Hoffmann et al., 2011). Based on many reconstructions of the history of soils, relief and river systems, we are now able to generalize about the fundamental effects of land use and climate on central European landscapes.
Land use or climate?
The observed variability in erosion reflects, to a large extent, the varying intensity of population pressure and agricultural land use in Germany. This is illustrated by the pronounced increase in soil erosion, particularly at the onset of and during the Neolithic times (ca. 5500-2200 BC in southern and central Germany) and by the distinctive decrease in soil erosion during the migration period (ca. 300-700 AD) and the early Medieval times (ca. 700-1000 AD) (Fig. 2) (Dotterweich, 2008). It seems that centennial-scale climate change affected the observed variability by modifying the boundary conditions for erosion. For example, there are few erosion records from the early and middle Bronze Age (ca. 2000-1600 BC), a period known to have been a prominent dry period in central Europe (Dotterweich, 2008). The most remarkable phase of soil erosion occurred in the first half of 14th century, at the beginning of the Little Ice Age. The second well-known intense soil erosion phase occurred in the mid-18th to early 19th century—at the end of the Little Ice Age. Historical records document extreme precipitation events during these two phases, implying an influence of climatic extremes on geomorphological processes. However, certain phases of the record remain unexplained. For instance, during Roman Emperor times (27 BC-476 AD) there is little indication of soil erosion even though there is no evidence for particularly dry conditions and population density was high (Fig. 2). As a general finding, the majority of the studies on soil erosion in small catchments indicate that sediment fluxes are highly sensitive to changes in local land use, while climate change plays a secondary role.
Legacies of catastrophic events
Most of the gully systems in central Europe today are a result of catastrophic rainfall events. In the year 1342 AD, for example, extreme erosion events initiated many gully systems and hill slope erosion delivering over 50% of the total colluvial material that exists today in the investigated areas in central Europe (Dotterweich, 2008). A few extreme events were responsible for most of the currently deposited slope sediments, significantly modifying flood and erosion regimes of the landscape. This period in history marks the change from natural- to human-dominated systems—a legacy that has ramifications for today's landscape. The ability of extreme events to cause steep changes in these landscapes, effectively changing the regional boundary conditions, should be seen as a warning for the potential impacts of extreme events in future climates. It also means that conventional modeling and assessment tools used for sustainable management strategies may be inadequate to accommodate legacies and complex interactions over decadal and centennial timescales because they generally don’t integrate extreme events.
Human-environment feedback
In contrast to reconstructions of geomorphic and pedologic history, there are only a few studies concerning possible feedbacks from land use. These studies equate societal collapse to vulnerability to climate change, agricultural maladaptation or a mixture of both. For example, historical studies show that during the first half of the 14th century, many villages in Germany were abandoned as an ultimate consequence of a combination of socio-cultural processes, crop failures and soil degradation (Bork et al., 1998; Dotterweich, 2008). Food prices became very expensive in several consecutive years of the first half of the 14th century because of shortages as a consequence of soil degradation and economic mismanagement (Fraser, 2010). This unfavorable socio-economic, nutritional, and health situation might have prepared the ground for the European-wide pandemic, namely the Black Death, between 1347 and 1351 AD. In the 18th to early 19th centuries, soil erosion and crop failures led to major migration overseas. Soil erosion appears to have been one factor in a complex causality spiral leading to socio-economic instability and land-use changes.
Modern day environments
In light of historical and recent data (severe floods with high costs to our societies), we now have new insight into the interactions between societies and their environment. This type of research has the potential to help in the development of modern sustainable land-use strategies by providing evidence for the different timescales and complexity of interactions between human activities and geomorphic responses. However, many past studies combine and correlate different time series, assuming causality and neglecting the legacy of past forcings and responses. Future approaches must better distinguish proximate from ultimate causes to deliver a new understanding of complex system behavior. The research also has to extend the scope of analysis to the full spectrum of human–environment interactions including the demise of agriculturally marginal systems and the histories of more subtle, adaptive and cumulative changes and processes. This will extend our observation of background processes in modern human-dominated landscapes and their natural variability. Past records have an important role to play in the creation of adaption strategies for complex agricultural systems around the world.
references
For full references please consult: pastglobalchanges.org/products/newsletters/ref2011_2.pdf